When you’re optimizing email automations, it can feel easiest to simply toss out the existing emails and start from scratch. After all, the existing emails:
And they may not even be worthy of the title “control.” That’s because a proper control should have proven itself; just because a thing exists does not make it a control, does it?
No, it doesn’t. However, your clients or your team are going to refer to it as the control… so roll with it. 😇
We’ve established that you should not start by throwing out the emails and starting from scratch. But what else should you avoid when optimizing an email automation?
Avoid rewriting any part of any email yet. You don’t know what’s working and what’s not. That subject line you hate? How’s it performing? We need to understand performance before we start developing hypotheses for how to improve performance.
Avoid commenting on writing style. Does an email feel particularly long to you? Or far too short? Are the paragraphs massive, or are there so many bullets you feel shot through? Does the voice feel dull to you, or is the tone way off, in your opinion? Great. You’re not the prospect, though, so keep it in your optimization notes – don’t start making assumptions or recommending changes yet.
Avoid solving guessed-at problems. Have the discipline to first fully identify the problem. And have the deeper discipline to do the work that comes before identifying problems. That is, have the discipline for what follows here…
First, audit the cadence itself. Get out your Miro board or Whimsical map – this is when you sketch some boxes and lines! Keep in mind this is largely a thinking-free exercise; all you’re doing is documenting what’s there, without any commentary.
We begin with a map, like the one shown above. The map shows if-then scenarios, triggers and boxcars, as well as core flows and segmentation. This map is likely to be more detailed than the automation map that’s in the CRM itself, so you want to create it outside the CRM. I use Whimsical.
Once the flow is mapped, we can audit it.
In this audit, you are looking for:
Second, map performance for each email in the flow. Write the following next to each email:
When it comes to revenue, I prefer revenue directly attributed to the email. This is a “last” attribution rather than an “each” attribution, for the ad folks in the room. So while all 8 emails in a flow may “each” contribute $100,00 to $800,000 in total revenue over the lifetime of the flow, Email 4 is the “last” email touched before $600,000 in revenue was generated; I would say Email 4 is freaking killer and everyone needs to be careful not to mess up anything to do with Email 4 — and while we’re on the subject, in our next phase, let’s really analyze what’s so freaking great about Email 4 so we can do more of that!
Next, you get to start using your brain. I look at the map as a whole. And I make big green circles around the parts that look so good we should basically hold them sacred and big red circles around the problems we’ve gotta get after immediately.
🟢 Emails with an unbalanced [high] amount of revenue attributed to them.
🟢 Emails with very high click-thru rates.
🟢 Emails with very high conversion rates.
🟢 Emails with ABNORMALLY high open rates.
🔴 No double opt-in email. (Exception: automation is not for new leads.)
🔴 If the “day zero” email(s) has an open rate under 40%.
🔴 Emails with ABNORMALLY high unsubscribe rates.
🔴 Emails with ABNORMALLY low revenue.
🟡 Cadence issues, such as what could be too much time between emails or not enough time between emails.
🟡 Segmentation issues, such as too many segments (where perhaps more conditional messages would simplify sends) or not enough segments (where diverse groups are lumped into one for the convenience, often, of the sender).
🟡 Black holes, and dead ends for live leads.
We also need to zoom out from the flow itself to audit sending practices. Compliance affects deliverability.
If an email sender has a poor reputation, their emails won’t land in an inbox. Identify your sender score with a tool like this, which also helps you optimize your sends overall.
Document what you’ve found, and present those findings to your team or client.
You’ll want to continue with a deeper heuristic analysis of the messages in the emails, including not only what you’re sending and how it’s written but also where the offer appears, if it’s optimized and much more. But first you need your team aligned on what’s currently happening with the automation. So present the above before moving on.
Countless examples of SaaS pricing pages, along with expert commentary from a SaaS conversion copywriter,…
SaaS pricing pages have a way of sparking disagreement in SaaS marketing teams. There’s always…
“We have 0% customer churn.” – said no SaaS marketer ever. Instead, what I hear…
Where do unshipped marketing assets go when they die? We imagine a place called Marketing…
Conversion copywriters follow a simple 3-step process to get the ‘yes’ in email campaigns: First,…
Taking your first steps in UX? Welcome! In this straightforward guide, we're breaking down the…
This website uses cookies and follows GDPR guidelines.
Read More.